‘without price’) instead of entimos, ‘highly valued’, but the point remains the same. There are a number of issues here.įirst, John misquotes the word as atimos, which means either worthless or beyond value (lit.

John cites the ‘sober German scholar’ Gerd Theissen, who pointed out ‘long ago’ that the word entimos (‘highly prized’) used to describe the value of the servant to the centurion in Luke 7.2, would have been understood by any Jew to mean that the slave was the centurion’s gay lover. It is about ‘doing what Jesus did’-which rather suggests it will not be acceptable to ‘agree to disagree’.Ī key question in all this is whether the text in question supports John’s position. So rejecting this is not just a problem of rights it is rejecting the central way that God pursues his kingdom purposes. You might have rejected them (he comments at 14.33) ‘but these are the ones God wants, Jesus says, these are the ones I have come for, these are the ones to whom the kingdom belongs.’ The rhetorical move here, via the story in Luke 7, is that, far from the traditional reading of the NT where same-sex relations are rejected as incompatible with the kingdom, gay people don’t simply become acceptable in the kingdom they become the archetypal members, in much the same way that Jesus holds children before the disciples as archetypes of kingdom membership. John is a consummate orator, and he begins with a story from his teenager years, when his vicar refers to the question of homosexuality of ‘that filthy business.’ In this way he builds a powerful, emotive case, that Jesus includes the excluded, and that if you oppose this you are unreasonable and prejudiced-and that gay people are amongst this excluded-now-included group.

You can listen to the sermon on the Cathedral’s Soundcloud stream. At the end of May, Jeffrey John, Dean of St Alban’s, preached at Liverpool Cathedral on the healing of the centurion’s servant in Luke 7.

Jesus and the centurion